Duration, Retention, and Engagement in Short Science Videos: A Reanalysis of 48 TikTok Posts

Authors

  • LENIN HOCHIMIN TENECELA-CALDERON Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64747/n60agq92

Keywords:

short-form video, TikTok, engagement, audience retention, science communication

Abstract

Short-form video expands the possibilities for science communication, yet its metrics are often conflated: reaching more people, sustaining viewing, and eliciting actions are not equivalent outcomes. This study characterized associations among duration, retention, discovery sources, reach, and engagement through a reproducible reanalysis of public data from 48 geoscience education videos posted on TikTok between October 2021 and February 2022. A single analytical matrix was reconstructed from the dataset’s primary sheet; rates were recalculated using reach as the denominator, and missingness, duplicates, and denominator consistency were audited. Robust descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations with bootstrap confidence intervals, permutation tests, and Benjamini–Hochberg correction were estimated. Parsimonious linear models with HC3 robust errors and sensitivity analyses excluding the top 5% of reach were also conducted. Median duration was 54.96 s, average percentage watched was 41.73%, completion was 18.46%, reach was 2,345 users, and composite engagement was 8.98%. Average retention (rho = 0.328; adjusted p = 0.033) and completion (rho = 0.390; adjusted p = 0.011) were positively associated with engagement. The share of views from the For You feed showed the strongest association with log reach (rho = 0.785; adjusted p < 0.001), whereas its relationship with engagement did not survive multiplicity correction. Duration was inversely associated with retention (rho = −0.473). Results remained directionally stable after removing extreme-reach videos. Discovery, consumption, and response should therefore be treated as distinct performance dimensions. The observational associations do not establish causality or support generalization beyond the studied account.

References

Boeker, M., & Urman, A. (2022). An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, 2298–2309. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512102

Bucknell Bossen, C., & Kottasz, R. (2020). Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers, 21(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186

Fähnrich, B., Weitkamp, E., & Kupper, J. F. (2023). Exploring ‘quality’ in science communication online: Expert thoughts on how to assess and promote science communication quality in digital media contexts. Public Understanding of Science, 32(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221148054

Ferreira, M., Lopes, B., Granado, A., Freitas, H., & Loureiro, J. (2021). Audio-visual tools in science communication: The video abstract in ecology and environmental sciences. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 596248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.596248

Gan, J., Shi, S., Filieri, R., & Leung, W. K. S. (2023). Short video marketing and travel intentions: The interplay between visual perspective, visual content, and narration appeal. Tourism Management, 99, 104795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104795

Hayes, C., Stott, K., Lamb, K. J., & Hurst, G. A. (2020). “Making every second count”: Utilizing TikTok and systems thinking to facilitate scientific public engagement and contextualization of chemistry at home. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3858–3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00511

Lu, S., Yu, M., & Wang, H. (2023). What matters for short videos’ user engagement: A multiblock model with variable screening. Expert Systems with Applications, 218, 119542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119542

Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 641673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673

Omar, B., & Dequan, W. (2020). Watch, share or create: The influence of personality traits and user motivation on TikTok mobile video usage. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(4), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429

Pavelle, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2020). Into the digital wild: Utilizing Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook for effective science and environmental communication. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 575122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.575122

Rein, B. (2023). Making science education more accessible: A case study of TikTok’s utility as a science communication tool. Neuroscience, 530, 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.08.021

van der Bend, D. L. M., Gijsman, N., Bucher, T., Shrewsbury, V. A., van Trijp, H., & van Kleef, E. (2023). Can I @handle it? The effects of sponsorship disclosure in TikTok influencer marketing videos with different product integration levels on adolescents’ persuasion knowledge and brand outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, 107723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107723

Xiao, L., Li, X., & Mou, J. (2024). Exploring user engagement behavior with short-form video advertising on short-form video platforms: A visual-audio perspective. Internet Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-07-2023-0521

Xiao, L., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing consumer engagement behavior regarding short-form video advertising: A big data perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103170

Yang, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Jiang, Y., & Li, J. (2025). Harmonizing sight and sound: The impact of auditory emotional arousal, visual variation, and their congruence on consumer engagement in short video marketing. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020069

Zawacki, E. (2022). TikTokData.xlsx [Data set]. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20069333.v1

Zawacki, E. E., Bohon, W., Johnson, S., & Charlevoix, D. J. (2022). Exploring TikTok as a promising platform for geoscience communication. Geoscience Communication, 5(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-5-363-2022

Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603

Downloads

Published

2025-06-29 — Updated on 2025-06-29

Versions

Issue

Section

Research articles

How to Cite

Duration, Retention, and Engagement in Short Science Videos: A Reanalysis of 48 TikTok Posts. (2025). Sapiens Global, 1(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.64747/n60agq92